Television commercials and billboards create expectations that personal injury cases settle quickly with large checks arriving within weeks. The reality involves much longer timelines with numerous steps before any money changes hands. Most injury cases take months to settle, and complex litigation can extend for years before resolution. Understanding realistic timelines helps you plan financially and avoid frustration about why your case hasn’t resolved as quickly as you expected.
Our friends at Blaszkow Legal, PLLC set realistic timeline expectations with every new client because disappointment about case duration creates more complaints than almost any other issue. A DUI accident lawyer experienced with these cases knows that rushing settlements usually means accepting less money than proper case development would yield, making patience financially beneficial despite the difficulty of waiting.
Why You Can’t Settle Before Treatment Ends
The single biggest factor affecting settlement timing is medical treatment duration. You cannot know your case’s full value until reaching maximum medical improvement when doctors determine you’ve recovered as much as expected.
Settling before treatment ends means accepting compensation based on incomplete damage information. If you settle thinking you’ll need three months of physical therapy then discover you actually need surgery, you cannot reopen the case to collect additional money.
Insurance companies love early settlements because they lock in low values before full injury extent becomes apparent. Refusing premature settlement pressure protects you from accepting inadequate compensation based on underestimated damages.
Medical treatment for serious injuries often continues for months or years. Complex fractures, brain injuries, spinal damage, and other severe trauma require extended recovery periods before maximum medical improvement.
The Investigation And Evidence Collection Phase
Before even demanding settlement, attorneys must investigate liability and gather evidence proving fault and damages. This process takes weeks or months depending on case complexity.
Obtaining police reports, medical records, accident scene documentation, and witness statements all require time. Some evidence like surveillance footage must be preserved through immediate action before retention periods expire.
Expert consultations about accident reconstruction, medical causation, or future care needs require scheduling, examinations, and report preparation that add weeks or months to case timelines.
The Demand And Negotiation Period
Once treatment completes and evidence is gathered, attorneys send demand letters to insurance companies outlining liability, damages, and settlement amounts sought. Insurers typically take 30 to 60 days responding to demands.
Initial responses almost never include acceptable settlement offers. Negotiation back and forth over values takes additional weeks or months. Some cases settle after a few rounds of negotiation while others reach impasse requiring litigation.
Insurance company bureaucracy slows everything. Adjusters must get supervisor approvals for settlement authority. Large settlements require committee reviews or corporate authorization adding delay.
When Cases Go To Litigation
If settlement negotiations fail, filing lawsuits starts formal litigation that substantially extends timelines. Court procedures add months or years before cases reach trial.
Discovery processes where both sides exchange information, take depositions, and gather evidence consume months. Courts set scheduling orders with deadlines spread over a year or more for completing discovery phases.
Motions practice addressing legal issues before trial adds time. Dispositive motions, evidentiary disputes, and procedural matters require briefing, hearings, and judicial decisions that extend timelines.
Trial dates get set many months in future when cases are filed. Court congestion means availability for multi-day trials requires scheduling far in advance. Cases filed today might not reach trial for 18 months or longer.
Realistic Settlement Timelines By Case Type
Simple cases with clear liability and modest damages might settle within 3 to 6 months after treatment ends. These quick settlements require cooperative insurance companies and straightforward facts.
Moderate complexity cases involving disputed liability or significant damages typically take 6 to 12 months from accident to settlement even without litigation. Investigation, treatment, and negotiation simply require this time.
Complex cases with severe injuries, multiple defendants, or unclear liability often take 12 to 24 months or longer. Litigation adds substantial time beyond what settlement negotiations alone require.
Cases going to trial can easily take 2 to 3 years from accident to verdict. Appeals add another 1 to 2 years if losing parties challenge jury decisions.
The Check Doesn’t Come The Next Day
Even after settlement agreements are reached, receiving money takes additional time. Insurance companies don’t write checks immediately upon verbal settlement agreement.
Settlement documents must be drafted, reviewed, and signed. Release forms require your signature giving up lawsuit rights in exchange for payment. This paperwork process takes 2 to 4 weeks.
Insurance companies then process settlements through their systems requiring additional time. Large settlements face more scrutiny and approval processes than small ones.
Checks get issued 2 to 6 weeks after signed releases in most cases. The money goes to your attorney who deposits it, waits for funds to clear, pays medical liens and case costs, then issues your portion. This disbursement process adds another week or two.
From verbal settlement agreement to money in your account typically takes 4 to 8 weeks. Don’t plan major purchases or financial obligations assuming settlement money arrives faster.
What Causes Unexpected Delays
Numerous factors create delays beyond anyone’s control:
- Insurance companies changing adjusters mid-case requiring new people to review files
- Medical providers slow to produce records or bills
- Defendant bankruptcy or death complicating who pays settlements
- Court scheduling conflicts pushing dates back
- Discovery disputes requiring judicial intervention
- Witness availability issues delaying depositions
- Insurance company authorization processes for settlement amounts
Each delay adds weeks or months to case resolution timelines despite everyone’s best efforts to move efficiently.
Why Patience Usually Pays
The temptation to accept quick settlements for immediate money often costs tens of thousands of dollars compared to waiting for proper case development. Insurance companies know financial pressure makes injured people accept insufficient offers.
Cases properly developed with complete medical treatment, thorough investigation, and adequate negotiation time yield substantially higher settlements than rushed resolutions. The additional money from patient case handling often outweighs the time value of receiving payments earlier.
We’ve seen cases where waiting an extra six months resulted in settlement increases of $50,000 or more as full injury extent became apparent and liability evidence strengthened.
When Quick Settlements Make Sense
Some circumstances justify accepting faster settlements at values below maximum potential. Minor injuries with predictable outcomes don’t benefit from extended treatment or investigation.
Financial emergencies sometimes force settlement timing decisions. If waiting means losing your home or facing bankruptcy, accepting available settlement money now might outweigh potential for higher future value.
Clear liability with generous insurance coverage and cooperative adjusters can yield full value settlements relatively quickly without needing litigation leverage.
The Litigation Decision Point
When settlement negotiations fail to produce fair offers, deciding whether to file suit involves weighing litigation time and cost against increased recovery potential. Litigation almost always extends timelines substantially.
Cases worth less than $50,000 to $100,000 might not justify 18 months of litigation even if trials would yield more because the additional money doesn’t compensate for the extended time. Larger cases make litigation time investment worthwhile.
Unrealistic Timeline Expectations
Personal injury attorneys hear constant questions about why cases take so long. Clients see TV advertisements suggesting fast settlements and assume their cases should resolve within weeks.
Law firms cannot control insurance company response times, court schedules, or medical treatment duration. The process simply requires time that rushing undermines through insufficient development.
If you’re pursuing a personal injury claim, understand that realistic timelines extend months or years depending on injury severity and case complexity. Quick settlements usually mean leaving money on the table, while patience during proper case development typically yields substantially higher compensation. The frustration of waiting becomes worthwhile when settlement checks arrive at amounts reflecting true injury impact rather than artificially low values from premature resolution pressure.
Posted on Kristen Kochendoerfer I reached out to this law firm after a work-related injury and was fortunate to speak with Dave. He was incredibly kind and helpful-he took the time to walk me through what I was dealing with and explained things clearly. Although his firm doesn’t handle cases exactly like mine, he didn’t just send me away. Instead, he connected me with trusted firms and resources that could help. It genuinely felt like talking to a family member who cared and wanted to make sure I was in good hands. I’m so grateful for the guidance and support.Posted on Bram Stockbauer I recently had a phone consultation with Mr. Kulwicki to cover a few questions I had related to medical malpractice cases. He provided very thoughtful and informative responses that demonstrated domain expertise, and didn't even require a fee. I would definitely recommend working with him if you ever find yourself in a position where a medical malpractice lawyer is needed.Posted on River Condict I recently had a consultation with David Kulwicki about a possible medical malpractice case for a family member who was just diagnosed with stage 4 terminal prostate cancer. From the start, David was kind, calm, and very easy to understand. He didn’t use complicated legal terms or talk over my head. He explained everything clearly, answered all my questions, and made sure I understood what the process could look like. There was no pressure and I never felt dismissed. He walked me through what the standard of care SHOULD have been when it comes to prostate screening, and helped me understand how this situation might meet the criteria for a potential malpractice claim. I also appreciated that his firm has nurses on staff to review the case based on the medical records. This is such a heavy, emotional situation for my entire family, but talking to David gave me clarity and a sense of direction. I’ll be sharing everything I learned with my loved ones, and I’m really grateful for the time, care, and honesty David gave me during our consultation. Thank you, truly.Posted on Taylor Thompson Mr. Kulwicki answered my questions and was very helpful. I will certainly reach out to him again if needed.Posted on Heather Kelly Mr. Kulwicki answered my questions in detail and was extremely knowledgeable. I greatly appreciate his advice and help! I will definitely seek his help in the future, if needed!Posted on Winnie Ma Drayer I came across Mr. Kulwicki's law practice website for some personal matters. After reviewing his website, I decided to reach out to him for some questions. I did not expect an attorney will get back with me with some good information without asking for a fee first. But Mr. Kulwicki got me to within a week with some good information. He was very friendly and sincere and took the time to explain to me about a potential medical malpractice case. Highly recommended!Posted on Zihan Chowdhury I recently listened to a message from Mr. David Kulwicki and I am very impressed. He spoke clearly, confidently and came across as precessional and thoughtful. Even without a direct consultation, his explanation felt genuine and informative. It gave me a sense of trust in his expertise and the way he communicates with potential clients.Posted on Marilyn. D. Boyer-Wilder I had inquired about a case and Attorney Kulwicki was referred to me. He called me right back just like they said he would. He throughly answered my questions, looked over my information and gave me a just answer. I was satisfied with his finding and I would definitely recommend Mishkind Kulwicki Law.Posted on Valerie Eve Mishkind Kulwicki provided insightful direction to take with the inquiries I had!Posted on Stef Elizabeth Mr. Kulwicki is a professional and courteous medical malpractice lawyer who always take the time to explain legal term to those who are new to medical malpractice. His website is well-organized and it is easy to get in contact with Mr. Kulwicki. He is easy to contact, and explains legal concepts simply. He is more than an apt lawyer and also a good man. Thanks for your counsel Mr. Kulwicki!