Improper dosing of anticoagulation can result in stroke, pulmonary embolism, bleeding, or death. Despite the great risk, a recent study published by the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) shows that underdosing and overdosing of newer blood thinner medications is rampant. The study focused on the use of novel direct acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as Pradaxa, Xarelto, Savaysa and Eliquis, in people with atrial fibrillation (AF).
AF is a condition where the heart beats irregularly due to errant electrical pulses. When at extended rest, blood within the heart can become static (stasis) and form blood clots. The heart then beats forcefully, expelling the blot clot into the blood stream. A mobile blood clot is called an embolism. Embolisms can travel through the blood stream into the brain, where they can block the supply of blood and oxygen to the brain. Blockage, or occlusion, causes brain tissue to die. A “stroke” refers to the clinical effects of permanently damaged brain tissue, which include brain damage, cognitive impairment, motor dysfunction, loss of bowel and bladder control and paralysis.
The risk of stroke from AF is higher in some patient than others. Doctors should determine this risk by calculating the patient’s CHADS2 score, as well as consideration of other less common risk factors. The CHADS2 score is based on the fact that (C)ongestive heart failure, (H)ypertension, (A)ge over 75, (D)iabetes and prior (S)troke or TIA symptoms raise the risk of stroke in patients having AF. Anticoagulation is used to prevent clots from forming while the heart is at extended rest.
Older anticoagulation drugs such as Warfarin and Coumadin required that the patient have routine blood work done to ensure that the patient’s clotting times remained in the proper range. Too much anticoagulation and the patient is at risk of bleeding, including a brain bleed called a hemorrhagic stroke. Too little anticoagulation and the patient remains at risk of blood clots. The amount of anticoagulation required to keep the patient’s clotting times (INR) in the therapeutic range varies from patient-to-patient, and can be affected by diet and other medications. So frequent blood checks were necessary.
The newer class of anticoagulants, the NOACs, were designed to reduce the amount of blood work needed to safely monitor a patient. Theoretically, the hassle and discomfort of frequent blood draws led to noncompliance by patients, thereby putting them at unnecessary risk of an embolic stroke. As an Ohio stroke lawyer, I have monitored the approval process for NOACs. Notoriously corrupt pharmaceutical companies stand to make huge profits by capturing market share in the sale of anticoagulants. Several months ago, I warned that these drugs may not be ready for prime time, given my skepticism about the industry-influenced vetting process. Soon thereafter, a number of fatalities related to side effects were reported.
The NEJM study found that in 43% of patients with AF and poor kidney function, physicians failed to adjust the dose downward to account for drug retention. Those patients on certain DOACs faced an increased risk of a bleeding. 13% of patients with normal kidney function were inexplicably prescribed lower than normal doses. Underdose increases the risk of stroke fivefold when compared with the standard dose for patients on certain DOACs. When a physician fails to prescribe a proper dose of any medication, and severe injury results, they are subject to a medical malpractice lawsuit under Ohio law.
People interested in learning more about our firm’s legal services, including medical malpractice in Ohio, may ask questions or send us information about a particular case by phone or email. There is no charge for contacting us regarding your inquiry. A member of our medical-legal team will respond within 24 hours.
Kristen Kochendoerfer2025-07-03 I reached out to this law firm after a work-related injury and was fortunate to speak with Dave. He was incredibly kind and helpful-he took the time to walk me through what I was dealing with and explained things clearly. Although his firm doesn’t handle cases exactly like mine, he didn’t just send me away. Instead, he connected me with trusted firms and resources that could help. It genuinely felt like talking to a family member who cared and wanted to make sure I was in good hands. I’m so grateful for the guidance and support. Bram Stockbauer2025-06-18 I recently had a phone consultation with Mr. Kulwicki to cover a few questions I had related to medical malpractice cases. He provided very thoughtful and informative responses that demonstrated domain expertise, and didn't even require a fee. I would definitely recommend working with him if you ever find yourself in a position where a medical malpractice lawyer is needed. River Condict2025-06-11 I recently had a consultation with David Kulwicki about a possible medical malpractice case for a family member who was just diagnosed with stage 4 terminal prostate cancer. From the start, David was kind, calm, and very easy to understand. He didn’t use complicated legal terms or talk over my head. He explained everything clearly, answered all my questions, and made sure I understood what the process could look like. There was no pressure and I never felt dismissed. He walked me through what the standard of care SHOULD have been when it comes to prostate screening, and helped me understand how this situation might meet the criteria for a potential malpractice claim. I also appreciated that his firm has nurses on staff to review the case based on the medical records. This is such a heavy, emotional situation for my entire family, but talking to David gave me clarity and a sense of direction. I’ll be sharing everything I learned with my loved ones, and I’m really grateful for the time, care, and honesty David gave me during our consultation. Thank you, truly. Taylor Thompson2025-06-11 Mr. Kulwicki answered my questions and was very helpful. I will certainly reach out to him again if needed. Heather Kelly2025-06-11 Mr. Kulwicki answered my questions in detail and was extremely knowledgeable. I greatly appreciate his advice and help! I will definitely seek his help in the future, if needed! Winnie Ma Drayer2025-06-10 I came across Mr. Kulwicki's law practice website for some personal matters. After reviewing his website, I decided to reach out to him for some questions. I did not expect an attorney will get back with me with some good information without asking for a fee first. But Mr. Kulwicki got me to within a week with some good information. He was very friendly and sincere and took the time to explain to me about a potential medical malpractice case. Highly recommended! Zihan Chowdhury2025-06-10 I recently listened to a message from Mr. David Kulwicki and I am very impressed. He spoke clearly, confidently and came across as precessional and thoughtful. Even without a direct consultation, his explanation felt genuine and informative. It gave me a sense of trust in his expertise and the way he communicates with potential clients. Marilyn. D. Boyer-Wilder2025-05-29 I had inquired about a case and Attorney Kulwicki was referred to me. He called me right back just like they said he would. He throughly answered my questions, looked over my information and gave me a just answer. I was satisfied with his finding and I would definitely recommend Mishkind Kulwicki Law. Valerie Eve2025-05-17 Mishkind Kulwicki provided insightful direction to take with the inquiries I had! Stef Elizabeth2025-05-05 Mr. Kulwicki is a professional and courteous medical malpractice lawyer who always take the time to explain legal term to those who are new to medical malpractice. His website is well-organized and it is easy to get in contact with Mr. Kulwicki. He is easy to contact, and explains legal concepts simply. He is more than an apt lawyer and also a good man. Thanks for your counsel Mr. Kulwicki!