As a Cleveland personal injury lawyer, I am frequently asked “what is the value of my claim”? In assessing the value of a personal injury, medical malpractice or wrongful death claim, one important factor under Ohio law is the non-economic damages caps. “Damages” is the term that lawyers use to describe all of the harms and losses caused by an injury or wrongful death. “Economic damages” refer to losses that come with an actual price tag, like loss of wages and benefits, costs of home care, medical and hospital costs, costs of institutional care (e.g., nursing home) and prescription costs. Non-economic damages include pain, suffering, loss of enjoyment of life and loss of usual activities. In Ohio, juries were historically given broad discretion to determine the amount of money that would compensate an injury victim for their non-economic damages. However, in 2005, that changed.
In 2005, the Ohio legislature, in a gift to big-money special interests, like the American Medical Association and the insurance industry, enacted so-called “tort reform” measures in Ohio. Many other States did the same. Included in these tort reform measures were caps on non-economic damages. In Ohio, the damages caps were broken down into 2 categories: caps on awards in medical negligence claims and caps on awards in general negligence lawsuits. General negligence lawsuits include all types of personal injury, including car crashes, trucking accidents, motorcycle accidents, explosions, electrocution, burns, construction site injuries, traumatic brain injury, and the like.
In general negligence cases, non-economic damages “shall not exceed the greater of $250,000.00 or an amount that is equal to three times the economic loss … to a maximum of $350,000.00.” This limit applies to each plaintiff up to a maximum of $500,000.00 for claim. So, for example, assume that an individual is in involved in a car accident and sustains multiple fractures that require surgery, resulting in more than $200,000.00 in medical bills. The person ultimately recovers from this serious injury. The person’s non-economic losses would be capped at $350,000.00 (3 x $200,000.00 up to a maximum of $350,000.00). If the individual has a spouse, the spouse would be entitled to a maximum of $150,000.00 on their loss of consortium claim ($500,000.00 maximum less $350,000.00 paid to the injured spouse). The total non-economic recovery is capped at $500,000.00.
Note that the statute also provides that there will be no cap on non-economic losses when the compensation is for “(a) permanent and substantial physical deformity, loss of use of a limb, or loss of a bodily organ system; or (b) permanent physical functional injury that permanently prevents the injured person from being able to independently care for himself or herself and perform life-sustaining activities.” This provision is usually fair in that it removes the damage cap in the case of catastrophic injuries.
In medical malpractice cases, the cap is less fair. The law provides for a cap of “$250,000.00 or an amount that is equal to three times the economic loss … to a maximum of $350,000.00.” Again, the cap applies to each plaintiff up to a maximum of $500,000.00, as in general injury cases. However, unlike general negligence cases, damages in medical malpractice cases are capped in catastrophic cases as well. Catastrophic injuries are defined the same way as in general negligence cases. In catastrophic medical negligence cases, non-economic losses are capped at $500,000.00 per plaintiff up to a maximum of $1,000,000.00. So, for example, if there is a surgical error that caused a patient to become quadriplegic, the patient’s non-economic damages will be capped at $500,000.00, while his/her family members can only recover $500,000.00 total. Using this example, you can see that compensation in a catastrophic medical negligence case can be miniscule when considering the impact that quadriplegia will have on the injured patient’s life.
In addition to caps on compensatory damages, the Ohio legislature also enacted caps on punitive damages. Compensatory damages refer to damages for the injured person’s actual harms and losses. Punitive damages are available in cases of egregious misconduct to punish a wrongdoer. Ohio law requires that any claim for punitive damages be tried separately from the claim for compensatory damages. Punitive damages are capped at 2 times the compensatory award. A smaller cap may apply for small businesses or individuals.
Note that the damages caps are limited to non-economic damages. They currently do not apply to economic losses. In addition, the caps only apply to claims in which the plaintiff sustained injury not death. Wrongful death claims are not subject to caps.
People interested in learning more about our firm’s legal services, including medical malpractice in Ohio, may ask questions or send us information about a particular case by phone or email. There is no charge for contacting us regarding your inquiry. A member of our medical-legal team will respond within 24 hours.
Kristen Kochendoerfer2025-07-03 I reached out to this law firm after a work-related injury and was fortunate to speak with Dave. He was incredibly kind and helpful-he took the time to walk me through what I was dealing with and explained things clearly. Although his firm doesn’t handle cases exactly like mine, he didn’t just send me away. Instead, he connected me with trusted firms and resources that could help. It genuinely felt like talking to a family member who cared and wanted to make sure I was in good hands. I’m so grateful for the guidance and support. Bram Stockbauer2025-06-18 I recently had a phone consultation with Mr. Kulwicki to cover a few questions I had related to medical malpractice cases. He provided very thoughtful and informative responses that demonstrated domain expertise, and didn't even require a fee. I would definitely recommend working with him if you ever find yourself in a position where a medical malpractice lawyer is needed. River Condict2025-06-11 I recently had a consultation with David Kulwicki about a possible medical malpractice case for a family member who was just diagnosed with stage 4 terminal prostate cancer. From the start, David was kind, calm, and very easy to understand. He didn’t use complicated legal terms or talk over my head. He explained everything clearly, answered all my questions, and made sure I understood what the process could look like. There was no pressure and I never felt dismissed. He walked me through what the standard of care SHOULD have been when it comes to prostate screening, and helped me understand how this situation might meet the criteria for a potential malpractice claim. I also appreciated that his firm has nurses on staff to review the case based on the medical records. This is such a heavy, emotional situation for my entire family, but talking to David gave me clarity and a sense of direction. I’ll be sharing everything I learned with my loved ones, and I’m really grateful for the time, care, and honesty David gave me during our consultation. Thank you, truly. Taylor Thompson2025-06-11 Mr. Kulwicki answered my questions and was very helpful. I will certainly reach out to him again if needed. Heather Kelly2025-06-11 Mr. Kulwicki answered my questions in detail and was extremely knowledgeable. I greatly appreciate his advice and help! I will definitely seek his help in the future, if needed! Winnie Ma Drayer2025-06-10 I came across Mr. Kulwicki's law practice website for some personal matters. After reviewing his website, I decided to reach out to him for some questions. I did not expect an attorney will get back with me with some good information without asking for a fee first. But Mr. Kulwicki got me to within a week with some good information. He was very friendly and sincere and took the time to explain to me about a potential medical malpractice case. Highly recommended! Zihan Chowdhury2025-06-10 I recently listened to a message from Mr. David Kulwicki and I am very impressed. He spoke clearly, confidently and came across as precessional and thoughtful. Even without a direct consultation, his explanation felt genuine and informative. It gave me a sense of trust in his expertise and the way he communicates with potential clients. Marilyn. D. Boyer-Wilder2025-05-29 I had inquired about a case and Attorney Kulwicki was referred to me. He called me right back just like they said he would. He throughly answered my questions, looked over my information and gave me a just answer. I was satisfied with his finding and I would definitely recommend Mishkind Kulwicki Law. Valerie Eve2025-05-17 Mishkind Kulwicki provided insightful direction to take with the inquiries I had! Stef Elizabeth2025-05-05 Mr. Kulwicki is a professional and courteous medical malpractice lawyer who always take the time to explain legal term to those who are new to medical malpractice. His website is well-organized and it is easy to get in contact with Mr. Kulwicki. He is easy to contact, and explains legal concepts simply. He is more than an apt lawyer and also a good man. Thanks for your counsel Mr. Kulwicki!