Cleveland Medical Malpractice Attorneys
As a medical malpractice lawyer, I am frequently tasked with determining the statute of limitations that applies to potential client’s medical malpractice claim. It seems like a simple question that should have a simple answer. However, often it doesn’t.
Generally speaking, the statute of limitations applicable to medical malpractice cases in Ohio is one year. (Different limitations may apply in other States.) Failure to file a medical malpractice lawsuit within the applicable statute of limitations forever bars the individual from pursuing compensation for injuries caused by the act of medical negligence. The general rule applies to all “medical claims,” which include nursing negligence, hospital negligence, pharmacy errors, dental malpractice, podiatric malpractice, and chiropractic malpractice. However, that general rule is subject to numerous exceptions.
One exception to the general rule is that the one-year statute of limitations applicable to medical claims does not begin to run until the patient terminates the patient-healthcare worker relationship. For example, if a patient has surgery that results in complications and continues to see the surgeon in follow up for those complications, the statute of limitations does not run until the patient stops seeing the surgeon. This exception only applies when the ongoing treatment is related to the original surgery, treatment or condition.
Another exception is the so-called “discovery rule.” The discovery rule tolls the statute of limitations until the patient discovers sufficient operative facts to put them on notice that they may have suffered an injury due to an act of medical negligence. For example, if a patient is treating with a physician who misdiagnoses or fails to take proper measures to diagnose their condition, then discovers later that they have suffered irreparable harm due to the delay in diagnosis and resulting delayed treatment, the one-year statute of limitations does not begin to run until the correct diagnosis is made.
A recent law enacted to address the government lockdown due to the Covid-19 pandemic may add additional time to the one-year statute of limitations. House Bill 197 tolled the statute of limitations between March 30, 2020 and July 30, 2020. This law adds an additional 4 months to the one-year statute of limitations so long as the statute of limitations did not expire prior to March 30, 2020.
The foregoing exceptions to the statute of limitations are subject to a related law called the statute of repose. The statute of repose imposes an absolute 4-year deadline for filing medical negligence lawsuits. So, for example, if the discovery rule extends the statute of limitations for five years, the patient must still file his/her lawsuit within four years of the date of the act of medical negligence. The statute of repose does not apply to so-called retained foreign object cases. A “retained foreign object” means that a medical device, piece of equipment or padding was mistakenly left in the patient during surgery when it should have been removed.
Ohio law also provides that a patient can extend their statute of limitations by issuing a so-called 180-day letter. A 180-day letter extends the statute of limitations by 180 days, if it is served before expiration of the one-year statute of limitations. Service, according to current law, occurs when the 180-day letter is mailed via certified mail. This is a new rule that has not been tested in the courts.
Note that when an act of medical negligence results in death, Ohio’s two-year wrongful death statute applies to damages arising from the moment of death. This sets up an unusual situation in Ohio where two separate statutes of limitation apply. The one-year statute of limitations applies to those damages occurring between the act of medical negligence and the moment of death whereas the two-year statute of limitations applies from the moment of death on.
Ohio law also provides that the statute of limitations is tolled while a patient is a minor or during a period of incompetency. Different rules apply when incompetency arises as a result of the act of medical negligence as opposed when the incompetency pre-dates the act of medical negligence.
As you can see, the determination of the applicable statute of limitations can involve a detailed factual inquiry and application of a variety of laws. The facts and application of these laws can create gray areas that lead to legal controversy. Generally, we try to avoid unnecessary controversies by filing suit within the initial one year following an act of medical negligence, when possible. It is important for clients who are concerned about a potential act of medical negligence to consult an experienced medical malpractice lawyer as soon as possible in order to avoid potential pitfalls associated with time limitations.
For more information about the Ohio statute of limitations for medical malpractice, contact us to consult with one of our Cleveland medical malpractice attorneys. Call us today at Mishkind Kulwicki Law Co., L.P.A..
Kristen Kochendoerfer I reached out to this law firm after a work-related injury and was fortunate to speak with Dave. He was incredibly kind and helpful-he took the time to walk me through what I was dealing with and explained things clearly. Although his firm doesn’t handle cases exactly like mine, he didn’t just send me away. Instead, he connected me with trusted firms and resources that could help. It genuinely felt like talking to a family member who cared and wanted to make sure I was in good hands. I’m so grateful for the guidance and support. Bram Stockbauer I recently had a phone consultation with Mr. Kulwicki to cover a few questions I had related to medical malpractice cases. He provided very thoughtful and informative responses that demonstrated domain expertise, and didn't even require a fee. I would definitely recommend working with him if you ever find yourself in a position where a medical malpractice lawyer is needed. River Condict I recently had a consultation with David Kulwicki about a possible medical malpractice case for a family member who was just diagnosed with stage 4 terminal prostate cancer. From the start, David was kind, calm, and very easy to understand. He didn’t use complicated legal terms or talk over my head. He explained everything clearly, answered all my questions, and made sure I understood what the process could look like. There was no pressure and I never felt dismissed. He walked me through what the standard of care SHOULD have been when it comes to prostate screening, and helped me understand how this situation might meet the criteria for a potential malpractice claim. I also appreciated that his firm has nurses on staff to review the case based on the medical records. This is such a heavy, emotional situation for my entire family, but talking to David gave me clarity and a sense of direction. I’ll be sharing everything I learned with my loved ones, and I’m really grateful for the time, care, and honesty David gave me during our consultation. Thank you, truly. Taylor Thompson Mr. Kulwicki answered my questions and was very helpful. I will certainly reach out to him again if needed. Heather Kelly Mr. Kulwicki answered my questions in detail and was extremely knowledgeable. I greatly appreciate his advice and help! I will definitely seek his help in the future, if needed! Winnie Ma Drayer I came across Mr. Kulwicki's law practice website for some personal matters. After reviewing his website, I decided to reach out to him for some questions. I did not expect an attorney will get back with me with some good information without asking for a fee first. But Mr. Kulwicki got me to within a week with some good information. He was very friendly and sincere and took the time to explain to me about a potential medical malpractice case. Highly recommended! Zihan Chowdhury I recently listened to a message from Mr. David Kulwicki and I am very impressed. He spoke clearly, confidently and came across as precessional and thoughtful. Even without a direct consultation, his explanation felt genuine and informative. It gave me a sense of trust in his expertise and the way he communicates with potential clients. Marilyn. D. Boyer-Wilder I had inquired about a case and Attorney Kulwicki was referred to me. He called me right back just like they said he would. He throughly answered my questions, looked over my information and gave me a just answer. I was satisfied with his finding and I would definitely recommend Mishkind Kulwicki Law. Valerie Eve Mishkind Kulwicki provided insightful direction to take with the inquiries I had! Stef Elizabeth Mr. Kulwicki is a professional and courteous medical malpractice lawyer who always take the time to explain legal term to those who are new to medical malpractice. His website is well-organized and it is easy to get in contact with Mr. Kulwicki. He is easy to contact, and explains legal concepts simply. He is more than an apt lawyer and also a good man. Thanks for your counsel Mr. Kulwicki!