The Truth About Medical Malpractice Litigation – Part 1

//The Truth About Medical Malpractice Litigation – Part 1

The Truth About Medical Malpractice Litigation – Part 1

When I talk to strangers about what I do for a living or lecture to students, or just discuss the topic of Ohio Medical Malpractice at a social gathering, I discover that many, if not most, people have deeply held negative beliefs about the judicial system and the concept of suing a doctor or a hospital. These beliefs fuel the negative attitude toward lawyers that are willing to stand up and fight for the injured and make the job of obtaining justice a never ending battle that favors doctors and punishes the injured victims. The myths and the negative beliefs are simply untrue and cause more harm and damage to our society and deflect from the real issues, namely improving safety and preventing costly medical errors. In the course of my travels over the past 33+ years, there are certain common themes that seem to come up over and over again. They include, but are not limited to, the following myths and suing for medical malpractice:

  1. There is a litigation crisis in which people are too quick to sue.
  2. The number of lawsuits is skyrocketing and increases every year.
  3. Most people who sue are out to get something for nothing.
  4. Jurors are easily swayed by slick lawyers.

All of these and other myths are not true. Not only are they not true, but they result in a system that promotes excusing and protecting doctors when they are sued from being held responsible and they lead to a healthcare system where profits are put ahead of patient safety. A recent article written by the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School reached the following conclusions:

  1. Preventable medical errors are widespread but few injured patients file lawsuits.
  2. Medical negligence lawsuits are rare and declining in number.
  3. Juries are able to handle medical malpractice cases.
  4. Juries are not anti-physician; in fact, the opposite is true.
  5. Verdicts are far smaller than commonly believed.
  6. Medical malpractice awards and payments reflect the severity of the injury.
  7. Far from being “broken,” experts say that the current medical malpractice system works well.
  8. Litigation actually improves patient safety.
  9. The best way to reduce malpractice litigation is to reduce the amount of malpractice.
People interested in learning more about our firm’s legal services, including medical malpractice in Ohio, may ask questions or send us information about a particular case by phone or email. There is no charge for contacting us regarding your inquiry. A member of our medical-legal team will respond within 24 hours.
By David Kulwicki|2019-11-21T16:05:57+00:00January 22nd, 2014|Medical Malpractice|Comments Off on The Truth About Medical Malpractice Litigation – Part 1
Personal Injury Cases Arising out of Workplace Injuries weeks
Car Accidents Involving Lyft or Uber months
Great article! months
What Not To Do If You Are In an Accident with a Commercial Truck months
Brain Injury After Concussion May Linger months
Ask the Expert - Supporting Siblings in a Special Needs Family | Milestones Autism Resources | August 07, 2019 | Mi… months
Can I Sue a Hospital for Hiring a Bad Doctor? months
Take a look at my new profile page. You can stop by & refer new clients anytime. months
How to File a Medical Malpractice Lawsuit in Ohio months
How is Medical Malpractice Defined in Ohio months
[map address="23240 Chagrin Blvd. Beachwood, OH 44122" type="roadmap" map_style="custom" overlay_color="" infobox="default" infobox_background_color="" infobox_text_color="" infobox_content="Mishkind Kulwicki Co., L.P.A." icon="//" width="100%" height="350px" zoom="12" scrollwheel="no" scale="no" zoom_pancontrol="no" popup="no" class="" id=""][/map]