New Screening Techniques for Lung Cancer Screening

//New Screening Techniques for Lung Cancer Screening

New Screening Techniques for Lung Cancer Screening

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of death in the U.S.  According to the American Cancer Society (ACS), there will be 228,190 new cases diagnosed and 159,480 deaths from this disease in 2013.  A key preventative strategy has been to screen patients who are at increased risk, such as smokers.  Until recently, screening had been done by a routine chest x-ray.  However, new recommendations adopted by the ACS suggest that the use of a lung CT scan is more effective for screening.

According to the ACS, “

[u]sually symptoms of lung cancer do not appear until the disease is already in an advanced, non-curable stage. Even when symptoms … do appear, many people may mistake them for other problems, such as an infection or long-term effects from smoking. This may delay the diagnosis.”  So, screening is recommended in patients aged 55-74 with a significant smoking history to catch the condition in an early stage before symptoms arise.

A study published this year in the New England Journal of Medicine reports that screening using a CT scan is more effective and may reduce lung cancer mortality by 20%.  The study was so important that the recommendation to use CT imaging was immediately adopted as part of ACS screening guidelines.

Medical malpractice claims may arise in Ohio out of mistakes made in screening smokers.  Previously, these cases were limited to the following situations: (a) failure to screen patients who meet screening criteria; (b) lost or mis-read screening films; and (c) failure to report abnormal findings picked up serendipitously on other imaging studies.  Now, an additional basis for a lawsuit may arise if screening is done using a chest radiograph rather than a chest CT scan.

To prove medical negligence in such cases, you must show that the negligent care resulted in a delay in diagnosis that permitted the cancer to progress from an early, treatable stage (usually proven by the fact that the missed cancer was small, that the patient had no symptoms and there was no indication of advanced disease) to an advanced, incurable stage (proved by staging done at the time of diagnosis).

People interested in learning more about our firm’s legal services, including medical malpractice in Ohio, may ask questions or send us information about a particular case by phone or email. There is no charge for contacting us regarding your inquiry. A member of our medical-legal team will respond within 24 hours.

By |2019-03-18T22:02:36+00:00May 10th, 2013|Medical Malpractice|0 Comments

Leave A Comment

Take a look at my new profile page. You can stop by & refer new clients anytime. month
How to File a Medical Malpractice Lawsuit in Ohio months
How is Medical Malpractice Defined in Ohio months
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, scleroderma, or other autoimmune diseases already have dysfunctional imm… months
Oklahoma Attorney General Mike Hunter announced a historic settlement involving Purdue Pharma LP that was set for t… months
Aneurysms are survivable with prompt medical attention. Just ask the Mother of Dragons. months
Less texting = safer roads. months
Patients can't afford their medications. months
Another jury links lymphoma to Roundup. months
Would you hop into a self-driving Uber? months
[map address="23240 Chagrin Blvd. Beachwood, OH 44122" type="roadmap" map_style="custom" overlay_color="" infobox="default" infobox_background_color="" infobox_text_color="" infobox_content="Mishkind Kulwicki Co., L.P.A." icon="//" width="100%" height="350px" zoom="12" scrollwheel="no" scale="no" zoom_pancontrol="no" popup="no" class="" id=""][/map]