Another Road Block for Medical Malpractice Victims

//Another Road Block for Medical Malpractice Victims

Another Road Block for Medical Malpractice Victims

Medical malpractice lawsuits have gotten increasingly difficult to pursue in recent years.  Increasing costs of litigation, negative public opinion, and unnecessary tort reform measures enacted by legislators corrupted by donations from Big Business, Big Insurance and Big Medicine, have led to an overall reduction in the number of medical negligence claims being pursued, while rates of medical negligence remain frighteningly high.  If this were not enough, a new law further guts the rights of victims of poor medical care.

Hidden in the Bipartisan Budget Act (BBA) recently approved by Congress is language that is damaging to plaintiffs covered by Medicaid. The provision overturns a unanimous 2006 United States Supreme Court decision in United States vs. Ahlborn. In Ahlborn, the Supreme Court ruled that only the portion of the settlement that represented payment for medical expenses could be claimed by the state Medicaid agency. The BBA allows a State to claim ALL of a settlement or judgment. The BBA provision will result in plaintiffs who are Medicaid recipients recovering less or, in many cases, it will make it economically infeasible to pursue claims altogether since the entire recovery will have to be reimbursed to Medicaid.

Currently, Medicaid and Medicare are entitled to reimbursement for funds expended on behalf of victims of medical malpractice.  However, the subrogation lien could only be satisfied from that portion of the recovery that reflected payment for medical expenses.  Further, the subrogation interest is subject to a setoff for attorneys fees and expenses incurred in making the recovery.  The subrogation interest was also subject to negotiations when the recovery resulted from a compromise settlement.  Now, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) can set their sights on the entire recovery without regard for these other factors.

The reason behind the change is to raise revenue, but this is specious when considering that fewer claims will be brought if the tort victim is likely to recover nothing.  The BBA provision probably constitutes an unconstitutional taking by the overreaching government.  Moreover, this legislation is immoral in that it taxes tort victims’ recoveries for pain, suffering and lost wages.

People interested in learning more about our firm’s legal services, including medical malpractice in Ohio, may ask questions or send us information about a particular case by phone or email. There is no charge for contacting us regarding your inquiry. A member of our medical-legal team will respond within 24 hours.
By |2019-03-18T22:02:18+00:00January 20th, 2014|Medical Malpractice|0 Comments

Leave A Comment

Ask the Expert - Supporting Siblings in a Special Needs Family | Milestones Autism Resources | August 07, 2019 | Mi… weeks
Can I Sue a Hospital for Hiring a Bad Doctor? weeks
Take a look at my new profile page. You can stop by & refer new clients anytime. months
How to File a Medical Malpractice Lawsuit in Ohio months
How is Medical Malpractice Defined in Ohio months
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, scleroderma, or other autoimmune diseases already have dysfunctional imm… months
Oklahoma Attorney General Mike Hunter announced a historic settlement involving Purdue Pharma LP that was set for t… months
Aneurysms are survivable with prompt medical attention. Just ask the Mother of Dragons. months
Less texting = safer roads. months
Patients can't afford their medications. months
[map address="23240 Chagrin Blvd. Beachwood, OH 44122" type="roadmap" map_style="custom" overlay_color="" infobox="default" infobox_background_color="" infobox_text_color="" infobox_content="Mishkind Kulwicki Co., L.P.A." icon="//" width="100%" height="350px" zoom="12" scrollwheel="no" scale="no" zoom_pancontrol="no" popup="no" class="" id=""][/map]